Some top article directory sites online frown heavily on vendors that things so heavy article without the help of keywords that the articles that almost no sense. Therefore, we had no choice but to make the rules on the density of keywords, you can blame, because obviously these standards should be a clear abuse of the paper's authors write for the sellers of the article or the article-marketing writer trying to game engines search.
Now search engines are on this and often as content online discount, reduction of ratings, and that is really bad news for a line SITE MAP article, and its community of authors. However, there is really no reason for things keyword if you have a good dictionary synonyms, because you can use replacement words, to harness the long tail theory, which is probably as good in the long run, all modes.
Unfortunately, knowing all of this article some vendors are working on these new standards for the density of specific words Articles and now uses software programs to enter and edit words with a kind of treasure replacement program, then send the same article over and over again – only changing some sentences, adverbs, nouns and verbs.
Worse, these people hire people in third world countries, they pay peanuts, then take your articles and turn an item you bought for $ 3 and make it 10-versions. This is done to fill the categories and basically flooding providing content on specific market niches. To make matters worse, the article is written by them, which was written by someone perhaps India, and / or a computer.
Why is this a problem? What about creating content AI is not only a tool to Internet entrepreneurs? Sure, but the articles are basically junk and nothing replicated. Therefore, does not serve the reader, internet, deposit or humanity directory for that matter. However, these writings are capable of moving through the key rules of the density of words created by the content type of the library sites.
Thus, the rules created to stop cheating and improve the quality of the authors are victimizing honest and manipulators are limited to change its behavior, tactics and computer programs to exploit and master the rules of online competition. As I see these things develop, often laugh at the absurdity of it all and the we believe we can do to enforce moral standards on the Internet.
But on a side note, I find it alarming, because competition against cheaters looks a lot like my old days of athletes competing against those taking steroids. I could beat, but I had to work three times harder, made me realize, I do not like laziness, cheating or manipulative. Maybe you think of this because, frankly, I'm getting tired of it.
Comments on this entry are closed.